Constructing accountability in inter-organisational collaboration

Author:

Andersson Johanna,Wikström Ewa

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse how accounts of collaboration practice were made and used to construct accountability in the empirical context of coordination associations, a Swedish form of collaboration between four authorities in health and social care. They feature pooled budgets, joint leadership and joint reporting systems, intended to facilitate both collaboration and (shared) accountability. Design/methodology/approach – Empirical data were collected in field observations in local, regional and national settings. In addition, the study is based on analysis of local association documents such as evaluations and annual reports, and analysis of national agency reports. Findings – Accountability is constructed hierarchically with a narrow focus on performance, and horizontal (shared) accountability as well as outcomes are de-emphasised. Through this narrow construction of accountability the coordination associations are re-created as hierarchical and accountability is delegated rather than shared. Research limitations/implications – Features such as pooled budgets, joint leadership and joint reporting systems can support collaboration but do not necessarily translate into shared accountability if accountability is interpreted and constructed hierarchically. Practical implications – When practice conforms to what is counted and accounted for, using the hierarchical and narrow construction of accountability, the result may be that the associations become an additional authority. That would increase rather than decrease fragmentation in the field. Originality/value – This research derives from first-hand observations of actor-to-actor episodes complemented with the analysis of documents and reports. It provides critical analysis of the construction and evaluation of accounts and accountability related to practice and performance in collaboration. The main contribution is the finding that despite the conditions intended to facilitate inter-organisational collaboration and horizontal accountability, the hierarchical accountability persisted.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference30 articles.

1. Bouckaert, G. , Peters, B.G. and Verhoest, K. (2010), The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Shifting Patterns of Public Management, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills Basingstoke.

2. Bryson, J.M. , Crosby, B.C. and Stone, M.M. (2006), “The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66 No. S1, pp. 44-55.

3. Byrkjeflot, H. , Neby, S. and Vrangbaek, K. (2012), “Changing accountability regimes in hospital governance: Denmark and Norway compared”, Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 3-23.

4. Currie, G. and Hodges, R. (2011), “Leadership in public services networks: antecedents, process and outcome”, Public Administration, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 242-264.

5. Currie, G. and Suhomlinova, O. (2006), “The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in UK NHS: The triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy”, Public Administration, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 1-30.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3