Development of a Single-Factor Scale to Measure Leader Accountability

Author:

Wood James A. (Andy)1,Ventura Heidi R.2

Affiliation:

1. Regent University, USA

2. Trevecca Nazarene University, USA

Abstract

Wood and Winston defined leader accountability as the leader's response to (1) his/her willing acceptance of the responsibilities inherent in the leadership position to serve the well-being of the organization; (2) the implicit or explicit expectation that he/she will be publicly linked to his/her actions, words, or reactions; and (3) the expectation that the leader may be called on to explain his or her beliefs, decisions, commitments, or actions to constituents. They developed three scales—the Responsibility, Openness, and Answerability Scales—to form the Leader Accountability Index (LAI). Use of the scales in subsequent research has suggested the possibility of combining the three to form a single factor instrument to measure leader accountability. This chapter updates the literature on leader accountability since the LAI was first published, reviews the data collection and factor analyses involved in creating the new Leader Accountability Scale (LAS), and discusses implications of the new scale's usefulness in leadership research and organizational practice.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference38 articles.

1. Newcastle City Council and the grassroots: accountability and budgeting under austerity

2. Constructing accountability in inter-organisational collaboration

3. Transformational leadership and organizational culture.;B. M.Bass;Public Administration Quarterly,1993

4. Blackmon, V. Y. (2008). Strategic planning and organizational performance: An investigation using the balanced scorecard in non-profit organizations (Publication No. 3311386) [Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

5. Bodenmiller, J. J. (2015). A Quantitative relational analysis of leadership style and leader accountability in non-profit organizations (Publication No. 3714860) [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Phoenix]. Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Playing the Long Game: A Dimension of Organizational Spirituality;Biblical Organizational Spirituality, Volume 2;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3