Author:
Griffin Ray,O'Toole Thomas
Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to examine the meaning and nature of the structure metaphor in the social sciences, and the consequent implications for the academic activity of describing and substantiating new structural forms of multinational corporations (MNCs) in the international business discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper's approach is primarily conceptual, but also introduces some fieldwork. The paper contrasts generalist work in the social sciences on structure with a close reading of the foundational texts on structure in MNCs along with a broader reading on the considerable attempts to describe new structures for MNCs. By interrelating these literatures with fieldwork that deconstructs stories from actors within MNCs, it opens a broader criticism on the discourse on structuring the MNC.FindingsThe paper suggests that the phalanx of new MNC structures could, perhaps, be better understood as a criticism of using the structure metaphor to describe the MNC. On safer ground, it suggests the point of difference between older forms of MNC and the variously described new forms arise from the contrasting definitions of structure used by Giddens.Originality/valueThe paper's originality and value arise from its unique consideration of the structure metaphor in social sciences and the discourse on structure in the international business discourse. It responds to calls for new research methods, and more critical approaches by those hoping to assist managers, in this functionally‐oriented discourse.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference107 articles.
1. Abrahamson, E. (1991), “Managerial fad and fashion: the diffusion and rejection of innovations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 586‐612.
2. Alvesson, M. and Berg, P. (1992), Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism: An Overview, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.
3. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1986), “Tap your subsidiaries for global reach”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64 No. 6, pp. 87‐94.
4. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1994), “Changing the role of top management: beyond strategy to purpose”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 No. 6, pp. 79‐88.
5. Bell, D. (1973), The Coming of Post‐industrial Society, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献