On the meanings of structure in the international business discourse

Author:

Griffin Ray,O'Toole Thomas

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to examine the meaning and nature of the structure metaphor in the social sciences, and the consequent implications for the academic activity of describing and substantiating new structural forms of multinational corporations (MNCs) in the international business discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper's approach is primarily conceptual, but also introduces some fieldwork. The paper contrasts generalist work in the social sciences on structure with a close reading of the foundational texts on structure in MNCs along with a broader reading on the considerable attempts to describe new structures for MNCs. By interrelating these literatures with fieldwork that deconstructs stories from actors within MNCs, it opens a broader criticism on the discourse on structuring the MNC.FindingsThe paper suggests that the phalanx of new MNC structures could, perhaps, be better understood as a criticism of using the structure metaphor to describe the MNC. On safer ground, it suggests the point of difference between older forms of MNC and the variously described new forms arise from the contrasting definitions of structure used by Giddens.Originality/valueThe paper's originality and value arise from its unique consideration of the structure metaphor in social sciences and the discourse on structure in the international business discourse. It responds to calls for new research methods, and more critical approaches by those hoping to assist managers, in this functionally‐oriented discourse.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference107 articles.

1. Abrahamson, E. (1991), “Managerial fad and fashion: the diffusion and rejection of innovations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 586‐612.

2. Alvesson, M. and Berg, P. (1992), Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism: An Overview, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.

3. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1986), “Tap your subsidiaries for global reach”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64 No. 6, pp. 87‐94.

4. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (1994), “Changing the role of top management: beyond strategy to purpose”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 No. 6, pp. 79‐88.

5. Bell, D. (1973), The Coming of Post‐industrial Society, Basic Books, New York, NY.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3