Author:
Appelbaum Steven H.,Roy Michel,Gilliland Terry
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this article is to provide a more complete perspective regarding the “best practices” for performance appraisals of “distant” employees in global organizations.Design/methodology/approachA range of published works (1998‐2009) on multinational corporations and performance appraisals was reviewed. The literature was used to determine human resource challenges associated with globalization as well as the types of performance appraisals, common pitfalls and elements for improvement of appraisal systems. Concepts were then combined to determine the “best practices” for performance appraisal in a global setting. Finally, a small questionnaire consisting of six questions was constructed and sent to managers in two companies in the health care industry meeting the criteria of having “distant” employees. The questions were open‐ended in order to allow for a variety of responses enabling the researchers to view trends and make comparisons with the literature.FindingsAdequate training must be provided to both the appraiser and the appraisee in order to avoid the many rating errors that are common in performance appraisal. Training should include cultural, legal and customer differences by country providing managers with the tools to improve on the process. Managers must also be given the opportunity to build the required relationship with these employees.Research limitations/implicationsA questionnaire was sent to several key managers in two complex pharmaceutical firms meeting the criteria with responses received. Further empirical research on the best practices of performance appraisal for distant employees in global organizations should be pursued.Practical implicationsThis article provides a source of information on what practices are followed in order to support the performance appraisal of “distant” employees in different parts of the world.Originality/valueThere is limited literature dealing with “distant” employee performance appraisal in global organizations and this article attempts to fill this gap.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. Appelbaum, S.H., Nadeau, D. and Cyr, M. (2008), “Performance evaluation in a matrix organization: a case study (Part two)”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 295‐9.
2. Bailey, J., Chen, C. and Dou, S. (1997), “Conceptions of self and performance‐related feedback in the US, Japan and China”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 605‐25.
3. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing across Borders, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
4. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1992), “What is a global manager”, Harvard Business Review, September‐October, pp. 124‐32.
5. Boice, D.F. and Kleiner, B.H. (1997), “Designing effective performance appraisal systems”, Work Study, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 197‐201.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献