Author:
Kesting Peter,Parm Ulhøi John
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline the “grand structure” of the phenomenon in order to identify both the underlying processes and core drivers of employee‐driven innovation (EDI).Design/methodology/approachThis is a conceptual paper. It particularly applies the insights of contemporary research on routine and organizational decision making to the specific case of EDI.FindingsThe main result of the paper is that, from a theoretical point of view, it makes perfect sense to involve ordinary employees in innovation decisions. However, it is also outlined that naïve or ungoverned participation is counterproductive, and that it is quite difficult to realize the hidden potential in a supportive way.Research limitations/implicationsThe main implication is that basic mechanisms for employee participation also apply to innovation decisions, although often in a different way. However, the paper only identifies the grand structure of the phenomenon. The different identified drivers have to be further elaborated and empirically tested.Practical implicationsEDI is a helpful tool to gain competitive advantage by utilizing the knowledge and creative potential of employees.Originality/valueThis is the first paper that gives a systematic overview of the grand structure of EDI and derives the most important moderating factors from that.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference75 articles.
1. Amabile, T.M. (1988), “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, pp. 127‐67.
2. Amabile, T.M., Schatzel, E.A., Moneta, G.B. and Kramer, S.J. (2004), “Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity, perceived leader support”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 5‐32.
3. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1154‐85.
4. Bakker, A.B. and Demerouti, E. (2008), “Towards a model of work engagement”, Career Development International, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 209‐23.
5. Banker, R.D., Field, J.M., Schroeder, R.G. and Sinha, K.K. (1996), “Impact on work teams on manufacturing performance: a longitudinal field study”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 867‐90.
Cited by
206 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献