Individual and contextual factors influencing engagement in learning activities after errors at work

Author:

Leicher Veronika,Mulder Regina H.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this replication study is to identify relevant individual and contextual factors influencing learning from errors at work and to determine if the predictors for learning activities are the same for the domains of nursing and retail banking. Design/methodology/approach – A cross-sectional replication study was carried out in retail banking departments of a German bank. In a pre-study, interviews were conducted with experts (N = 4) of retail banking. The pre-study was necessary to develop vignettes describing authentic examples of error situations which were part of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled out by 178 employees. Findings – Results indicate that the estimation of an error as relevant for learning positively predicts bankers’ engagement in social learning activities. The tendency to cover up an error predicts bankers’ engagement negatively. There are also indirect effects of error strain and the perception of a safe social team climate on the engagement in social learning. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the generalization of results by transferring and testing a model of learning from errors in a domain different from the previous domains where this topic was investigated.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Development,Social Psychology

Reference59 articles.

1. Adizes, I.K. (2014), “Change and its repercussions for the banking industry”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice , Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 5-8.

2. Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2011), “Learning from the failures of others: the effects of post-exit knowledge spillovers on recipient firms”, Journal of Workplace Learning , Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 358-375.

3. Antonacopoulou, E.P. (2004), “The dynamics of reflexive practice: the relationship between learning and changing”, in Reynolds, M. and Vince, R. (Eds), Organizing Reflection , Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 47-64.

4. Aspden, P. , Corrigan, J.M. , Wolcott, J. and Erickson, S.M. (2004), Patient Safety , National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

5. Bauer, J. (2008), “Fehler und Lernen aus Fehlern. Die Notwendigkeit deskriptiver und kumulativervempirischer Forschung [Errors and learning from errors: a plea for descriptive and cumulative empirical research]”, Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik , Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 306-310.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3