Abstract
PurposeThis research paper aims to elucidate why and how a fair supervisor influences an employee's job satisfaction. While various theoretical approaches have been explored and numerous explanatory mechanisms investigated in prior organizational justice research, it is still unclear which explanatory mechanism is the dominant one to explain fairness effects. To address this gap, the author compares six distinct explanatory mechanisms of fairness effects on job satisfaction.Design/methodology/approachThe author conducted a three-phase survey study with 309 employees from diverse organizations. The author measured all variables twice to control for stability effects and ensure stable findings. The author combined a path analysis with bootstrapping procedures using Mplus 8.3 software.FindingsThe influence of supervisor fairness on job satisfaction is primarily transmitted through an employee's negative emotions, a mechanism often examined in previous organizational justice research adopting the moral perspective of fairness.Practical implicationsSupervisors can increase employees' satisfaction with their jobs by treating them fairly and promoting a fair work environment. To increase the benefits of workplace fairness, supervisors can focus on the intervening mechanisms, such as emotions.Originality/valueFirst, the author provides a fine-grained understanding of why supervisor fairness increases job satisfaction. Second, the author clarifies how the effects of supervisor fairness are transmitted. Third, the author identifies the most critical mediator to explain how supervisor fairness affects job satisfaction.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference119 articles.
1. Taking a deeper look inside autonomous and interdependent teams: why, how, and when does informational dissimilarity elicit dysfunctional versus beneficial effects;European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,2020
2. The vicious cycle of unfairness and conflict in teams;International Journal of Conflict Management,2021
3. Organizational justice research: a review, synthesis, and research agenda;European Management Review,2023
4. Does procedural justice climate increase the identification and engagement of migrant workers? A group engagement model perspective;Personnel Review,2022
5. Explaining the relationship between ethnicity and depressive symptoms: the roles of climate for inclusion, job self-efficacy, and job demands;Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2023