Lacking balance?

Author:

Hyman Jeff,Summers Juliette

Abstract

The UK has operated a lightly regulated approach to help employees balance their work and domestic obligations, an approach which employers have welcomed and which they and Government consider to be successful. On the basis of empirical studies this paper challenges these assumptions and outcomes. Apart from definitional difficulties, seven major problems associated with current UK practice over work‐life balance are identified. The first problem concerns unevenness of adoption across different sectors and organisations. The second is a lack of formalisation of policies at organisational level, with largely untrained line mangers having discretion over policy application. Third, there is restricted employee voice over the introduction and implementation of policies. Fourth, policies are introduced primarily to meet business needs, rather than those of employees. Fifth, there is no evidence of reductions in working hours. Sixth, tangible and intangible work intrusions into domestic life have been identified. Finally, domestic responsibilities are still conducted primarily by women irrespective of their employment status. The researchers conclude that many employees continue to face difficulty in reconciling their work and domestic responsibilities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. Bargaining Report (2003), No. 234, Labour Research Department, London.

2. Belt, V., Richardson, R., Webster, J. and Tijdens, K. (1999), Work Opportunities for Women in the Information Society: Call Centre Teleworking, Final Report, Centre for Urban & Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.

3. Bond, S., Hyman, J., Summers, J. and Wise, S. (2002), Family‐Friendly Working? Putting Policy into Practice, York Publishing Services, York.

4. Charles, N. and Kerr, M. (1999), “Women's work”, in Allan, G. (Ed.), The Sociology of the Family, Blackwell, Oxford.

5. Cooper, C., Dewe, P. and O'Driscoll, M. (2001), Organizational Stress, Sage, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3