Abstract
Creative processes halt when those who generate creative ideas self‐censor them. Self‐censorship may become a greater concern in performance management as organizations of the future are likely to face growing pressures to be creative, innovative, and adaptive. Self‐censorship was addressed in early research on managing the performance of brainstorming groups, and may have broad implications for creative performance in many facets of today’s organizations. This paper re‐examines the research on self‐censorship in view of recent management and social psychology research in an effort to better understand how the self‐esteem motive and a lack of self‐concept clarity cause self‐censorship. Person‐focused and feedback‐focused strategies to reduce self‐censorship are described, and directions for future research are suggested.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology
Reference43 articles.
1. Amabile, T.M. (1996), Creativity in Context, 2nd ed., >Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
2. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1154‐84.
3. Axtell, C.J., Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K.L., Wall, T.D. and Waterson, P.E. (2000), “Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 265‐85.
4. Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Bowers, P.G. (1967), “Effect of hypnosis and suggestions on reduced defensiveness on creativity test performance”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 35, pp. 311‐22.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献