Author:
Cassell Catherine,Lee Bill
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to provide a piece of empirical work that examines the impact of trade union learning representatives in enabling access to learning by those groups traditionally less likely to access such opportunities. This aim is discussed in relation to the literature on the significance of organizational learning.Design/methodology/approachThe research conducted included an in‐depth qualitative interview study of full‐time trade union officials with some responsibility for learning in their union.FindingsThe findings are discussed in relation to how trade union learning representatives are approaching their role; how learning is being facilitated; who is gaining access to learning and how; and the ownership of learning more generally.Originality/valueThe paper presents original data on a new learning initiative about which very little is currently published.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology
Reference38 articles.
1. Antonacopoulou, E. (2000), “Employee development through self‐development in three retail banks”, Personnel Review, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 491‐508.
2. Armstrong, H. (2000), “The learning organization: changed means to an unchanged end”, Organization, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 355‐61.
3. Blackler, F. and McDonald, S. (2000), “Power, mastery and organizational learning”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 833‐51.
4. CIPD (2004), Union Learning Representatives: The Change Agenda, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
5. Coopey, J. (1995), “The learning organization: power, politics and ideology”, Management Learning, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 193‐213.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献