Abstract
PurposeService failure and recovery encounters are often witnessed by other customers, but little is known about how these encounters impacts other customers. With an aim to bridge this gap, the purpose of the paper is to explore why and how service recovery directed at a focal customer impacts other customers who are present in the same service environment.Design/methodology/approachThe paper follows a qualitative research methodology. Purposive sampling was used to collect data from 30 customers through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The data was analysed using thematic analysis.FindingsFindings of the study show that service recovery directed at a focal customer has an impact on other customers' fairness judgments, emotions, service quality perceptions and behaviour. Other customers' behavioural reactions in response to observed service recovery are driven by two different motives: self-interest and moral obligation. Observing customers' cautious behaviour and (re)purchase behaviour are found to be primarily driven by self-interest, whereas their helping behaviour, punishment behaviour and word-of-mouth behaviour are found to be driven by moral obligation.Research limitations/implicationsThis study findings contribute to theory development on “other-oriented” effects of service recovery and provides valuable insights for effective management of service failures in the shared service environment.Originality/valueThis is the first study, which qualitatively explores the “other customers” perspective of service recovery in the context of shared servicescape.
Subject
Public Administration,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference87 articles.
1. The influence of customer-to-customer interactions on elderly consumers' satisfaction and social well-being;International Journal of Hospitality Management,2019
2. Managing service recovery experience: effects of the forgiveness for older consumers;Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2021
3. Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness;Research on Negotiation in Organizations,1986
4. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior;Journal of Retailing,1997