Pervasive interactions: a purposive best evidence review with methodological observations on the impact of housing circumstances and housing interventions on adult mental health and well‐being

Author:

Johnson Robin

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present an overview of the current state of evidence on the effect of housing circumstances, and housing‐related interventions, on adult mental health and well‐being. It covers the entire range of health from chronic illness to positive thriving, and both individual and community‐level/public health.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based upon a purposive review, commissioned originally for the UK Department of Health; and therefore is selective in giving priority to research relevant to public policy considerations, and to the UK context. Research with a variety of methodological foundations is considered, where robust enough by its own standards.FindingsThe available evidence gives conditional support to policies accentuating empowerment at individual and community levels; early intervention; locality or place‐based interventions; and integrated working practice. The complexity of methodological issues emerges as a key challenge for research in this field, and for the prospect of evidence‐based national policy. Meanwhile local knowledge and interpretation of data in context may be more reliable than context‐blind studies.Research limitations/implicationsWhere “hard evidence” is unavailable, reports of the lived experience of individuals and in communities remain a legitimate basis for policy and commissioning.Originality/valueThis appears to be the first attempt in print to cover such a wide canvas in one overview.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference140 articles.

1. ADASS (2008), Mental Health into the Mainstream: An ADASS Discussion Paper, ADASS, London.

2. Al‐Khudairy, N. (2000), “The changing idea of community”, in Tucker, S. (Ed.), Dialogue and Dwelling: A Therapeutic Community Approach to Care in the Community, Jessica Kingsley, London.

3. Allen, C., Camina, M., Casey, R., Coward, S. and Wood, M. (2005), Mixed Tenure Twenty Years On: Nothing Out of the Ordinary, Chartered Institute of Housing, London.

4. Allen, G. and Duncan Smith, I. (2008), Early Intervention: Good Parents, Great Kids, Better Citizens, Centre for Social Justice, London, available at: www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/../earlyinterventionpaperfinal.pdf.

5. Allen, G. and Duncan Smith, I. (2010), “The cross‐party challenge: early intervention for children and families”, Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 5 No. 1, Pier Professional.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3