Mental health and the settings of housing support – a systematic review and conceptual model

Author:

Burgoyne Jon

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this qualitative systematic review is to examine how the nature and quality of housing affect adults receiving support for mental health problems, focusing on the less considered structural aspects of housing. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic search identified relevant research. Data consisting exclusively of service-user testimony was taken from seven studies based in varied types of accommodation in England. A synthesis was carried out using thematic analysis, and a conceptual model developed based on the themes identified from the data. A literature review examines the context, with relevant material drawn from a variety of disciplines and professions. Findings – There were three main determinants of whether housing was a setting that enabled users to benefit from support and enjoy a good quality of life – “autonomy”, “domain”, and “facilitation”. Secondary themes influenced these primary themes, or described respondents’ condition or feelings in relation to their housing situation. The “Tripod Model” illustrates the relationships between these themes. Research limitations/implications – Applying systematic review methods to qualitative material proved contentious and challenging. The model produced is a hypothesis based on limited data and requiring further investigation. Practical implications – The findings suggest that a balance is required to increase the chances of successful and sustainable housing outcomes for service-users. Originality/value – The model enables a holistic understanding of issues affecting service-users, and the interdependent nature of these. It offers a new typology based on a synthesis of data drawn from a spectrum of accommodation, which gives it a breadth a single piece of research could not encompass.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference53 articles.

1. Ambrose, P. (1997), “Better housing as preventative medicine”, Housing Review, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 57-9.

2. Antman, E.M. , Lau, J. , Kupelnick, B. , Mosteller, F. and Chalmers T.C. (1992), “A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomised control trials and recommendations of clinical experts”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 268, pp. 240-8.

3. Appleby, L. (2004), The National Service Framework for Mental Health – Five Years On, Department of Health, London.

4. Atkins, S. , Lewin, S. , Smith, H. , Engel, M. , Fretheim, A. and Volmink, J. (2008), “Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt”, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 No. 21, available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/8/21

5. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3