Assessment of the service quality of a cancer information service using a new P‐C‐P attributes model

Author:

Philip George,Stewart Jonathan

Abstract

Describes the development and use of a modified SERVQUAL research instrument for measuring the service quality of a leading Cancer Information Support Service from the perspective of their “customers”. The evaluation findings were also used to inform the organisation to help it to improve its services. In order to identify the appropriate dimensions of service quality, a series of focus group meetings were run with providers of the Information Support Services and also with the users of the service. The meetings enabled the identification of six different dimensions of service quality which neatly mapped onto the new P‐C‐P attributes model, which was developed after extensive research of existing models such as SERVQUAL. Based on these dimensions, a questionnaire was then developed to assess service quality of the service. The main outcome from the research was the development of a research instrument suitable for measuring the service quality of a Cancer Information Support Service. This instrument can be adapted to assess the quality of any other service.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference20 articles.

1. Anderson, E.A. and Zwelling, L.A. (1996), “Measuring service quality at the University of Texas MD. Anderson Cancer Center”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 9 No. 7, pp. 9‐22.

2. Babakus, E., and Boller, G.W. (1992), “An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 24, pp. 253‐68.

3. Babakus, E., and Mangold, G. (1992), “Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation”, Health Services Research, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 767‐85.

4. Bitner, M.J. and Hubbert, A.M. (1994), “Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus quality”, in Rust, R.T. and Oliver, R.L. (Eds), Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, Sage, London, pp. 72‐94.

5. Bowers, M., Swan, J. and Koehler, W. (1994), “What attributes determine quality and satisfaction with health care delivery”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 49‐55.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3