Author:
Benn Shaun,Abratt Russell,Kleyn Nicola
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to establish how executive managers in a South African organisation prioritise and manage reputational risks arising from stakeholder claims. The authors establish how corporate reputation and reputational risk fits into their decision making when considering stakeholder claims.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors conducted in-depth interviews with the top management of a South African paint manufacture. They identified eight stakeholder claims and discussed how they assessed and addressed each one.
Findings
Respondents identified highly, moderate, and low salient claims. They reported on how they dealt with these different claims in terms of the attributes of power, legitimacy, and urgency.
Originality/value
This is an empirical theory-testing study of how managers deal with stakeholder claims. The authors establish how corporate reputation and reputational risk fits into their decision making when considering stakeholder claims. The authors suggest that managers must not only understand who their stakeholders are, but need to evaluate the impact of stakeholder claims in order to manage reputational risk.
Reference34 articles.
1. Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate reputations;European Journal of Marketing,2012
2. Social media, reputation risk and ambient publicity management;Strategy and Leadership,2010
3. Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2008
4. Stakeholder marketing: beyond the four Ps and the customer;Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,2008
5. The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business leaders;Business Horizons,2005
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献