Abstract
PurposeThis study jointly examines consumer attitudes towards gene-edited (GE) food and their preferences for labelling such products. Thus, it contributes to understanding the role of educational background, objective/subjective knowledge, environmental concern and socio-demographics in the context of GE food.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was administered to two generations of young individuals (millennials and Generation Z; n = 234) from two neighbouring European Union (EU) regions (Belgium and The Netherlands), which have a stringent policy on (labelling) genetically modified (GM) food. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and ordered logit models (OLMs) were employed to identify key determinants of attitudes towards GE food and GE labelling preferences, respectively.FindingsAttitudes towards GE food were determined by environmental concern (negative) and objective knowledge (positive). Key factors influencing preferences for GE labelling were a non-hard-scientific background, knowledge about relevant policies and a negative attitude towards GE food. Preference for applying a similar labelling policy to both GM and GE was itself linked to having low, objective EU policy-related GM food knowledge and one's nationality.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies to examine consumer attitudes towards GE food products, while also addressing a lack of research on GE food labelling preferences. By highlighting the preferences of young generations for a revised policy approach, this study sheds new light on the current GE debate, notably, by promoting a deeper understanding of a group which has so far received limited attention in the discourse on the acceptance of novel plant-breeding technologies.
Subject
Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference69 articles.
1. Two decades of GMOs- how can the new technology help meet SDG,2020
2. Personality traits, knowledge and consumer acceptance of genetically modified plant and animal products;Food Quality and Preference,2020
3. Agricultural biotechnology: the promise and prospects of genetically modified crops;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2014
4. Dealing with rejection: an application of the exit–voice framework to genome-edited food;Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,2019
5. Debunking the myth of general consumer rejection of green genetic engineering: empirical evidence from Germany;International Journal of Consumer Studies,2017
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献