Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to identify specific changes in the content of the psychological contract during mergers and acquisitions (M&As), looking into both the “previous” and the “current” psychological contract.Design/methodology/approachA total of 255 non‐managerial employees who had recently gone through a MorA, participated in the study. They were asked to evaluate both their previous psychological contract (prior to the MorA) and their current psychological contract (after the MorA). Paired t‐tests provided support for the propositions stated.FindingsStatistical analysis revealed that employee perceptions of both organizational obligations and contributions change after a MorA. Furthermore, employees with limited coping with changes ability are more likely to consider that their contract has changed after a MorA.Research limitations/implicationsThe cross‐sectional character of this study may have increased common method bias. Still, no other option existed in this organizational setting.Practical implicationsThese findings suggest that major organizational changes, such as MorA significantly impact on individuals' view of their employment relationship. In fact, employees that feel confident in handling organizational changes are more prone to believe that their psychological contract has replaced by a new, subordinate one. Consequently, it is important that organizational agents shield employees against M&As negative impact by fostering coping with changes ability.Originality/valueThe paper offers insights into psychological contracts after a major organizational change.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations
Reference112 articles.
1. Anderson, N. and Schalk, R. (1998), “The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19, S1, pp. 637‐47.
2. Appelbaum, S.H., Gandell, J., Yortis, H., Proper, S. and Jobin, F. (2000), “Anatomy of a merger: behaviour of organizational factors and processes throughout the pre‐during‐post‐stages (part 1)”, Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 9, pp. 649‐61.
3. Armenakis, A. (1999), “Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 3.
4. Ashkenas, R.N., DeMonaco, L.J. and Francis, S.C. (1998), “Making the deal real: how GE capital integrates acquisitions”, Harvard Business Review, January/February.
5. Atkinson, P.H., Barrow, C. and Connors, L. (2003), “Models of police probationer career progression: preconceptions of the psychological contract”, Human Resource Development International, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 43‐57.
Cited by
72 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献