Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: a longitudinal study

Author:

Gerlach FriederikeORCID,Hundeling Maike,Rosing Kathrin

Abstract

PurposeThe ambidextrous leadership model specifically describes opening and closing leader behaviors in the innovation process. This paper aims to emphasize the relevance of the ambidextrous leadership model with respect to leadership in innovation processes.Design/methodology/approachIn this longitudinal research design, 54 employees rated the ambidextrous leader behaviors and innovation performance concerning an innovation project over a period of six weeks. Traditional leadership styles (i.e. transformational, transactional, instrumental leadership, leader–member exchange) were assessed at a between-person level to identify their effects with respect to innovation performance.FindingsMultilevel regression analysis results showed that instrumental leadership as well as opening and closing leader behaviors were positively related to innovation performance. By contrast, transformational and transactional leadership as well as leader–member exchange (LMX) did not show significant associations with innovation performance.Originality/valueThe findings support the relevance of specific leader behaviors to the innovation process and therefore underline the importance of the ambidextrous leadership model.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference71 articles.

1. Amabile, T.M., Mueller, J.S., Simpson, W.B., Hadley, C.N., Kramer, S.J. and Fleming, L. (2002), “Time pressure and creativity in organizations: a longitudinal field study”, HBS Working Paper No. 02-073.

2. The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Making progress, making meaning;Research in Organizational Behavior,2016

3. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity. Managing paradoxes of innovation;Organization Science,2009

4. On making causal claims. A review and recommendations;The Leadership Quarterly,2010

5. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. and Lalive, R. (2014), “Causality and endogeneity. Problems and solutions”, in Day, D. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations, Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 93-117.

Cited by 59 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Führung unter Spannung;Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO);2024-09-04

2. The impact of innovative leadership and total quality management in 21st-century banking: an empirical insight and foresight;European Business Review;2024-08-07

3. Ambidextrous Innovation in Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review;Administrative Sciences;2024-07-15

4. Supply chain product innovation and marketing strategies under different fairness concerns;Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review;2024-07

5. Ambidextrous leadership: an emphasis on the mediating role of knowledge sharing and knowledge search;Annals of Operations Research;2024-06-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3