Ambidextrous Innovation in Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

AlSaied Mohammad1ORCID,McLaughlin Patrick1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK

Abstract

Projects work under constant pressure of resource and time constraints. In order to perform effectively and efficiently, innovation seems to be a significant factor. However, due to the different nature of projects as compared to the organization, projects have been finding it difficult to undertake such innovation. However, ambidextrous innovation, which seeks to balance exploratory and exploitative innovation, offers a possible solution. However, research on the relationship between ambidextrous innovation and project management is at an early stage. The purpose of the present research is to undertake a systematic review of the literature to build and synthesize the understanding of innovation ambidexterity at the project level. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, our research collected data from the Web of Science and SCOPUS databases. By adhering to the PRISMA approach, we ensured a rigorous and transparent approach to the systematic review study, allowing for comprehensive data collection and analysis. The results of the present review study suggest that interest is building rapidly to incorporate ambidextrous innovation into project management. Ambidextrous innovation seemed to positively impact both the performance and capability of projects to undertake the innovation. Further, important drivers such as organizational culture, knowledge management, innovation activities, and agility play key roles in undertaking ambidextrous innovation at the project level. Further, elements of the team such as team integration, alignment, and knowledge utilization also play key roles. Finally, the avenue of future research has also been highlighted.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference114 articles.

1. Innovation Management Measurement A Review;Adams;International Journal of Management Reviews,2006

2. Balancing Knowledge Sharing with Protecting the Efficacy of Formal Control in Open Innovation Projects;Leker;International Journal of Project Management,2022

3. Balancing Business Performance and Knowledge Performance of New Product Development Lessons from ITS Industry;Ahn;Long Range Planning,2006

4. An Overview of Design and Operational Issues of Kanban Systems;Akturk;International Journal of Production Research,1999

5. Managing Strategic Resources in Petroleum Industry Projects;Ojiako;Production Planning & Control,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3