Abstract
Emphasizes the need for clear terminology; distinguishes between
“competence” and “competency”. Argues that
competence and competency models have been used in three different
areas: recruitment, skill assessment and development. Considers
competence models, such as the MCI standards in the area of skill
assessment, which focus on What people can do; require clear,
measurable standards; and exclude grading. Discusses behaviour
inventories – which focus on how people behave and can be
graded in relation to recruitment and staff development. Makes a
distinction between intellectually based and morally based behaviours
which allows a “dartboard” model to be created with
“hard” competences at the centre, phasing out through
intellectually based behaviours to “soft” morally based
behaviour at the periphery. Behaviours, capabilities and attributes are
added to the vocabulary, hopefully to provide greater clarification.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference1 articles.
1. 1 Ashworth, P., “Is
competence good enough?”, NATFHE Journal, December 1990.
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献