Author:
Anker Thomas Boysen,Sparks Leigh,Moutinho Luiz,Grönroos Christian
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the ontological and semantic foundations of consumer-dominant value creation to clarify the extent to which the call for a distinct consumer-dominant logic (CDL) is justified. This paper discusses consumer-driven value creation (value-in-use) across three different marketing logics: product-dominant logic (PDL), service-dominant logic (SDL) and CDL. PDL conceptualises value as created by firms and delivered to consumers through products. SDL frames consumer value as a function of direct provider-consumer interaction, or consumer-driven chains of action indirectly facilitated by the provider. Recently, the research focus has been turning to consumer-dominant value creation. While there is agreement on the significance of this phenomenon, there is disagreement over whether consumer-dominant value creation is an extension of SDL or calls for a distinct CDL.
Design/methodology/approach
– This is a conceptual paper, which is informed by five cases of consumer dominance. The cases are used to clarify rather than verify the analysis of the ontological and semantic underpinnings of consumer-dominant value creation.
Findings
– The ontological and semantic analysis demonstrates that PDL and SDL have insufficient explanatory power to accommodate substantial aspects of consumer-dominant value creation. By implication, this supports the call for a distinct CDL.
Originality/value
– This paper contributes to the ongoing theoretical debate over the explanatory power of SDL by demonstrating that SDL is unable to accommodate important ontological and semantic aspects of consumer-driven value creation.
Reference78 articles.
1. Achrol, R.
and
Kotler, P.
(2012), “Frontiers of the marketing paradigm in the third millennium”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
, Vol. 32 No. 40, pp. 35-52.
2. AMA
(2008), “The American Marketing Association releases new definition for marketing”,
American Marketing Association
, 14
January.
3. Anker, T.
,
Kappel, K.
,
Eadie, D.
and
Sandøe, P.
(2012), “Fuzzy promises: explicative definitions of brand promise delivery”,
Marketing Theory
, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 267-287.
4. Arnould, E.J.
and
Thompson, C.J.
(2005), “Consumer culture theory (CCT): twenty years of research”,
Journal of Consumer Research
, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 868-882.
5. BBC
(2004), “Pub-goers facing ‘Burberry’ ban”, 20 August, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/3583900.stm (accessed 24 September 2013).
Cited by
75 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献