Building school connectedness through shared lunches
Author:
Neely Eva,Walton Mat,Stephens Christine
Abstract
Purpose
– School connectedness is a well-established protective factor for young people’s physical, mental, and social health. The purpose of this paper is to explore the promotion of school connectedness through the practice of shared lunches within a secondary school context in New Zealand.
Design/methodology/approach
– An ethnographic methodology was used to explore in-depth the mechanisms by which food practices included indicators of school connectedness, and used interviews and observations with teachers and 16-18-year-old students in a New Zealand secondary school.
Findings
– The results describe six key mechanisms by which shared lunches fostered school connectedness: showing common humanity, creating an informal setting, encouraging sharing, enabling inclusive participation, demonstrating sacrifice for the communal good, and facilitating experiences of diversity. These mechanisms contributed to increased social interactions in which people got to know each other better and were able to gain insight into others’ personalities. This allowed for opportunities to establish and strengthen social relationships, and contributed to indicators of connectedness.
Research limitations/implications
– The study is exploratory with findings reported from one school. Further research in other contexts on the value of shared lunches for building school connectedness is required.
Originality/value
– Shared lunches, as part of an overall strategy to develop a well-connected school community, are adaptable and can fit into a multitude of situations to meet different needs. The findings of this study contribute to understanding the mechanisms by which shared lunches can affect indicators of school connectedness.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education
Reference51 articles.
1. Barber, B.K.
and
Schluterman, J.M.
(2008), “Connectedness in the lives of children and adolescents: a call for greater conceptual clarity”,
Journal of Adolescent Health
, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 209-216. 2. Bloch, M.
(1999), “Commensality and poisoning”,
Social Research
, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 133-149. 3. Bond, L.
,
Butler, H.
,
Thomas, L.
,
Carlin, J.
,
Glover, S.
,
Bowes, G.
and
Patton, G.
(2007), “Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes”,
Journal of Adolescent Health
, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 357.e9-357.e18. 4. Chapman, R.L.
,
Buckley, L.
,
Sheehan, M.
and
Shochet, I.
(2013), “School-based programs for increasing connectedness and reducing risk behavior: a systematic review”,
Educational Psychology Review
, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 95-114. 5. Crepeau, E.B.
(2015), “An ethnographic analysis of a church supper in New England”,
Journal of Occupational Science
, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 54-70.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|