An overview of C-SOX and directions for future research

Author:

Bhabra Harjeet S.,Hossain Ashrafee Tanvir,Karmakar Vidyoot Roy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine existing literature, including both academic and practitioner publications, related to Canadian SOX (or C-SOX as it is popularly known). The study discusses the origins of the Act, the underlying motivations for enacting this legislation in Canada and its impact on corporate decisions since its inception in 2003. Design/methodology/approach The principal focus of this literature review is on C-SOX, its inception, reception, compliance and impact in Canada, both from business’ and investors’ critical perspectives. The authors have followed a two-step process to gather all the articles. First, the authors used a keyword search at Google Scholar and ProQuest (e.g. C-SOX, Canadian SOX, Bill 198, etc.) to gather all the articles. Second, the authors retained articles and abstracts that primarily dealt with the background framework and impact of the legislation. It is to be noted that C-SOX was mainly a reactionary legislation following the adoption of US-SOX in 2002. Any discussion of C-SOX is, therefore, incomplete without referencing the literature related to US-SOX. Findings In this review paper the evolution of C-SOX over time in Canada, as well as studies on its impacts and criticisms have been summarized. Based on the extensive research that followed the enactment of US-SOX, the authors also provide suggested research directions related to C-SOX in the future. Research limitations/implications C-SOX has been relatively underexplored and therefore, not much academic work is available presently. This study highlights this gap in the literature with the hope that researchers will devote their energy to understanding the broader ramifications of major legislations such as C-SOX which will potentially also inform future public policy choices. Practical implications This research will help both businesses and investors to understand each other’s perspectives and concerns regarding C-SOX. This paper will also be helpful to policy makers to identify potential areas of improvement in this and future legislative decisions in the future. Originality/value Using a qualitative approach this study combines the development of C-SOX as a legislation in Canada, its overall effectivity/drawbacks and explores the areas it impacts, both positively and negatively, along with criticisms and appreciations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance

Reference38 articles.

1. Reform of the audit process and the role of shareholder voice: transatlantic perspectives;European Business Organization Law Review,2004

2. Sarbanes-Oxley five years later: a Canadian perspective;Loyola University Chicago Law Journal,2008

3. Market conditions, governance and the information content of insider trades;Review of Financial Economics,2015

4. Impact of SOX on the returns to targets and acquirers in corporate tender offers;The North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2017

5. The Sarbanes-Oxley act and corporate acquisitions;Managerial Finance,2017

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Luckin Coffee;Cases on Uncovering Corporate Governance Challenges in Asian Markets;2023-12-07

2. Unconstitutionality and Failure of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the PCAOB (USA) and Similar Institutions;Geopolitical Risk, Sustainability and “Cross-Border Spillovers” in Emerging Markets, Volume II;2021

3. Regulations and corporate financial and investment policy;Managerial Finance;2020-03-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3