Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research

Author:

Mangan John,Lalwani Chandra,Gardner Bernard

Abstract

The majority of logistics research is primarily populated by quantitative research viewed through a positivist lens. Increasingly, there are calls for logistics research to more frequently employ qualitative methodologies. The trend in management research generally is increasingly to use methods and approaches which provide a middle ground between the contrasting positivist and phenomenological paradigms and perspectives. Methodological triangulation, using quantitative and qualitative methodologies, increasingly provides multidimensional insights into many management research problems. This paper urges logistics researchers to think about the paradigm through which they view the world and to explore the use of alternative methodologies. If the ultimate aim is to gain knowledge about the world then one needs to do this in the most valid way possible. This paper describes the dominant research paradigms and perspectives and their generally concomitant research methodologies and describes some research (decision‐making concerning choice of ports/ferries) where methodological triangulation, using quantitative and qualitative methodologies, yielded greater insights than would have been the case if a single research methodology had been employed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference38 articles.

1. Anderson, N. (1990), “Repertory grid technique in employee selection”, Personnel Review, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 9‐16.

2. Bartlett, D. and Payne, S. (1997), “Grounded theory: its basis, rationale and procedures”, in McKenzie, G., Powell, J. and Usher, R. (Eds), Understanding Social Research: Perspectives on Methodology and Practice, Falmer Press, London.

3. Berg, B. (1995), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Allyn & Bacon, London.

4. Brooks, M.R. (2000), “Performance evaluation of carriers by North American companies”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 205‐18.

5. Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.

Cited by 136 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Repertory grid technique and Honey’s content analysis: a methodological application to advance qualitative research in OSCM;International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management;2024-07-05

2. Enhancing AAA capabilities in humanitarian supply chains through 4PL adoption;Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management;2024-05-21

3. The Role of Reusable Packaging in Supply Chain Management: Insights from Machinery, Aerospace, and Automotive;2024 IEEE 15th International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA);2024-05-02

4. Determinant of Brand Preference among Young Consumers of Mobile Phones in Ekiti State and Lagos State, Nigeria;British Journal of Management and Marketing Studies;2024-03-01

5. What Motivates New Venture Investors? A Mixed-Method Study Approach;IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3