Author:
A. Olanrewaju AbdulLateef,J. Anavhe Paul
Abstract
Purpose
– With the increase in the cases of construction claims in Nigeria, many projects have remained uncompleted, while many of those completed receive poor client satisfaction. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how construction claims are managed.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 58 claim factors were identified and addressed to construction professionals through survey to indicate the extent at which the factors contributed to claims. A case study was conducted to illustrate claim management.
Findings
– In total, 37 factors were the major source of claims. Late payment, delayed approval of change order and delay cost were the extremely influential while the least were storage charges, loss of productivity, and costs of preparing claims. Evidences revealed that all stakeholders should play active roles to deliver “claim free” projects.
Practical implications
– The findings will be useful to practitioners in the effort to improve project delivery by providing some guidance on claim minimization. It is hoped that this study will encourage academics to conduct more research on this issue.
Originality/value
– There is no known conclusive empirical study on construction claim factors in Nigeria. In light of this, the findings offer greater opportunities for claim minimization/avoidance.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference44 articles.
1. Aibinu, A.A.
and
Jagboro, G.O.
(2002), “The effects of delays on projects delivery in Nigeria construction industry”, International Journal of Projects Management, Vol. 20 No. 20, pp. 539-599.
2. Aje, I.
(2012), “The impact of contractors prequalification on construction project delivery in Nigeria”, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 159-172.
3. Al Mohsin, M.
(2012), “Claim analysis of construction projects in Oman”, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 73-78.
4. Arditi, D.
and
Pattanakitchamroon, T.
(2006), “Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 145-155.
5. Ashworth, A.
and
Hogg, K.
(2007), Willis's Practice and Procedure for Quantity Surveyor, 12th ed., Blackwell Publishing Limited, Oxford.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献