Maximizing agreement on diverse ontologies with “wisdom of crowds” relation classification
Author:
Zhitomirsky-Geffet Maayan,Shalom Erez Eden
Abstract
Purpose
– Ontologies are defined as consensual formal conceptualisation of shared knowledge. However, the explicit overlap between diverse ontologies is usually very low since they are typically constructed by different experts. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to suggest to exploit “wisdom of crowds” to assess the maximal potential for inter-ontology agreement on controversial domains.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors propose a scheme where independent ontology users can explicitly express their opinions on the specified set of ontologies. The collected user opinions are further employed as features for machine classification algorithm to distinguish between the consensual ontological relations and the controversial ones. In addition, the authors devised new evaluation methods to measure the reliability and accuracy of the presented scheme.
Findings
– The accuracy of the relation classification (90 per cent) and the reliability of user agreement annotations were quite high (over 90 per cent). These results indicate a fair ability of the scheme to learn the maximal set of consensual relations out of the specified set of diverse ontologies.
Research limitations/implications
– The data sets and the group of participants in our experiments were of limited size and thus the presented results are promising but cannot be generalised at this stage of research.
Practical implications
– A diversity of opinions expressed by different ontologies has to be resolved in order to digitise many domains of knowledge (e.g. cultural heritage, folklore, medicine, economy, religion, history, art). This work presents a methodology to formally represent this diverse knowledge in a rich semantic scheme where there is a need to distinguish between the commonly shared and the controversial relations.
Originality/value
– To the best of the knowledge this is a first proposal to consider crowd-based evaluation and classification of ontological relations to maximise the inter-ontology agreement.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference41 articles.
1. Akbari, I.
and
Fathian, M.
(2010), “A novel algorithm for ontology matching”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 324-334. 2. Alasoud, A.
,
Haarslev, V.
and
Shiri, N.
(2009), “An empirical comparison of ontology matching techniques”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 379-397. 3. Aroyo, L.
and
Welty, C.
(2013), “Crowd truth: harnessing disagreement in crowdsourcing a relation extraction gold standard”, presented at Web Science 2013 Conference, 2-4 May, Paris. 4. Chaffee, J.
and
Gauch, S.
(2000), “Personal ontologies for web navigation”, in
Callan, A.A.J.
,
Rundensteiner, E.
and
Gauch, S.
(Eds), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 227-234. 5. Cheng, G.
,
Gong, S.
and
Qu, Y.
(2011), “An empirical study of vocabulary relatedness and its application to recommender systems”, in
Aroyo, L.
,
Welty, C.
,
Alani, H.
,
Taylor, J.
,
Bernstein, A.
,
Kagal, L.
,
Noy, N.
and
Blomqvist, E.
(Eds), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Semantic Web,
Springer
,
Berlin
, pp. 98-113.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|