Author:
Zhitomirsky-Geffet Maayan
Abstract
PurposeThe need for inclusive and logically consistent representation of diverse and even confronting viewpoints on the domain knowledge has been widely discussed in the literature in the past decade. The purpose of this paper is to propose a generic model for building an open coherent diversified knowledge organization system (KOS).Design/methodology/approachThe proposed model incorporates a generic epistemological component, the validity scope type, assigned to each statement in the constructed KOS. Statements are clustered by their association with various validity scope types into internally coherent subsystems. These subsystems form a knowledge organization network connected through the universal (consensual) subsystems with more than one validity scope type. The model extends the Galili’s Cultural Content Representation paradigm, which divides the knowledge content of a scientific theory into two confronting parts: body and periphery.FindingsThe knowledge organization network model makes it possible to comparatively examine similarities and differences among various viewpoints and theories on the domain knowledge. The presented approach conforms with the principle of Open Knowledge Network initiative for creation of open accessible knowledge.Practical implicationsThe proposed model can be used for ontological reasoning by a variety of information services, such as ontology-based decision-support and learning systems, diversified search and customer management applications.Social implicationsThe model enables explicit representation of social and cultural minority voices and historical knowledge in the KOS.Originality/valueThe main contribution of the proposed model is that it generalizes and enhances various previously proposed representations of epistemological aspects of KOS and allows for multiple inter-linked subsystems to coherently co-exist as part of the extensible network.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference61 articles.
1. Why individuals seek diverse opinions (or why they don’t),2013
2. Baclawski, K., Kokar, M.K., Matheus, C.J., Letkowski, J. and Malczewski, M. (2003), “Formalization of situation awareness”, in Kilov, H. and Baclawski, K. (Eds), Practical Foundations of Business System Specifications, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 25-39.
3. Ontology summit 2018 communique – contexts in context;Applied Ontology,2018
4. Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems;Library Resources and Technical Services,1986
5. The use of semantic web technologies for decision support-a survey;Semantic Web,2014
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献