Abstract
PurposeThis study focuses on consumer choice behavior in the context of a new European Union (EU) member state by examining cognitive, affective and normative mechanisms in consumer preference formation for domestic vs imported products.Design/methodology/approachData is drawn from a survey of 714 adult consumers. The research instrument included construct measures adapted from previous studies. The measurement model of domestic consumption was tested via covariance analysis. Once the construct reliability and validities were established, the structural model was evaluated to test the hypothesized relationships.FindingsThe findings suggest that affective and normative constructs (i.e. consumer ethnocentrism and patriotism) are stronger determinants of domestic consumption than rational considerations (the cognitive mechanism) such as perceptions of relative product quality of domestic vs imported products. The role of patriotism and cosmopolitanism as factors fuelling ethnocentric tendencies are confirmed.Practical implicationsOur results, showing the considerable relative strength of patriotism and ethnocentrism on domestic consumption suggest that managers of local brands and domestic institutions should be able to enhance their communication programs and develop close bonds with their consumers. This finding is an important signal to international entrants in positioning their international offerings, particularly as strong local brands are gaining market share in many emerging consumer markets.Originality/valueIn view of emerging transnational groupings such as the EU, this study examines possible consumer resistance to economic integration. It uses realistic data set drawn from adult consumers and focuses on a relatively homogeneous country with a small population allowing for a good external validity of findings.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference57 articles.
1. Ahmed, Z.U., Johnson, H.P., Yang, X., Fatt, C.F., Teng, H.S. and Boon, L.C. (2004), “Does country of origin matter for low involvements products?”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 102‐20.
2. Ang, S.H., Jung, K., Kau, A.K., Leong, S.M., Pornpitakpan, C. and Tan, S.J. (2004), “Animosity towards economic giants: what little guys think”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 29, pp. 190‐207.
3. Askegaard, S. and Ger, G. (1998), “Product‐country images: towards a contextualized approach”, European Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, pp. 50‐8.
4. Baggozi, R.P. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: a comment”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, August, pp. 375‐81.
5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74‐94.
Cited by
103 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献