User feedback as a management tool in academic libraries: a review

Author:

Porat Lynne

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a selective review of current research and practice on user feedback in academic libraries. By dividing user feedback studies into four categories: Library as Place, Navigation, Satisfaction, and User Experience, it aims to provide a framework for academic libraries embarking on a process of systematic user feedback. Design/methodology/approach By reviewing the literature on user feedback activities undertaken by several academic libraries, this paper offers insights into how users experience library services, collections, and space. Findings User feedback activities, particularly concerning noise and seating, are widespread in academic libraries. Practical implications The studies reviewed in this paper may be replicated by other libraries and used as a tool for managerial decision making. Originality/value The review is valuable for its analysis of the recent contributions to user feedback practice, as well as its description of the different methodologies employed and changes implemented.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference48 articles.

1. Aldes, L. (2016), “Patron use of library space: the gap between librarians’ expectations and actual behavior: a report”, Hebrew, available at: http://lib.haifa.ac.il/libinfo/assessment/images/pdf/libplace.pdf (accessed August 4, 2016).

2. Open source assessment of academic library patron satisfaction;Reference Services Review,2013

3. Ball, M. and Wolnick, M. (2010), “You don’t say? Students at the university of Virginia come clean when asked, what are you doing and how can we help?”, in Hiller, S., Justh, K., Kyrillidou, M. and Self, J. (Eds), Proceedings of the Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, University of Virginia Library, Association of Research Libraries, University Libraries - University of Washington, Baltimore, MD, October 29-31, pp. 181-193.

4. Stop having fun and start being quiet: noise management in the academic library;Library Issues,2008

5. Breen, M. and McCaffrey, C. (2013), “Dealing with the noise problem: libraries improving their LibQUAL+® scores on ‘quiet space for individual work’”, in Hall, I., Thornton, S. and Town, S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 10th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, University of York, York, July 22-25, pp. 41-45.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3