A research and industry perspective on automotive logistics performance measurement

Author:

Dörnhöfer Martin,Günthner Willibald A.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the current state of performance measurement (PM) in academic literature and in the automotive supply chain (SC). The research question is to what extent PM systems (PMS) in academic literature and in industry are applicable in automotive logistics. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a combination of a systematic literature review (SLR) and an industry survey. The SLR is used to identify literature on design aspects for PMS and current PMS reported in academic literature. The survey adds an industry perspective and is used to validate the design aspects found in literature. The synthesis aims to deliver both, current research gaps and needs in industry. Findings The findings from SLR indicate, there is a broad base of literature regarding design aspects for PMS. Literature on PMS in context of automotive logistics is nevertheless rare. The industry survey leads to the conclusion that conformity with design aspects from literature increases added value of PMS. Nevertheless, current PMS show improvement needs in automotive context. Academic literature lacks detailed process orientation, transparency and is seen as too high level to be helpful for practitioners. For systems in industry, the SC perspective can be improved. In addition, applicability for continuous improvement is identified as research need in industry and literature. Research limitations/implications Due to the selected survey approach, additional research is required to obtain more generalizable results. To increase reliability and validity, a selection of the findings should be further analyzed, e.g. by focusing on regions outside Western Europe or a more in depth analysis of selected aspects. In addition insights into selected research topics highlighted in the paper should be assessed in detail by applying different methodologies (e.g. case studies) to validate the findings. Originality/value The findings add to the research on PMS. Latest academic literature is reviewed. The findings are combined with an industry perspective. The combination of SLR and a broad survey enables us to draw conclusions which are relevant for researchers and practitioners alike. Where academic research should focus more on the practical applicability, industry can benefit from the findings by integrating a more holistic perspective into their PMS, especially with a SC wide evaluation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Transportation,Business and International Management

Reference56 articles.

1. Measuring logistics performance;Engineering Costs and Production Economics,1989

2. Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability;IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2012

3. Supply chain integration: a European survey;The International Journal of Logistics Management,2005

4. Measuring supply chain performance;International Journal of Operations and Production Management,1999

5. A study on lean supply chain performance measures of SMEs in the automotive industry,2011

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards predictive analytics in internal logistics – An approach for the data-driven determination of key performance indicators;CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology;2023-09

2. ESTRATÉGIA NA GESTÃO LOGÍSTICA DA CADEIA DE SUPRIMENTOS: UM ESTUDO MULTICASO COM EMPRESAS DE SOLUÇÕES PARA O SETOR DE MINERAÇÃO;Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade;2021-07-09

3. Performance Measurement System: A Case Study;Operations Management for Social Good;2019-10-15

4. Promoting logistics performance in Vietnam-based manufacturing firms;International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management;2019-02-11

5. Key characteristics for designing a supply chain performance measurement system;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2019-02-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3