Abstract
PurposeThis article aims to report on a usability study to assess whether students performed better after working through a screencast library tutorial or a web‐based tutorial with screenshots.Design/methodology/approachThis qualitative study asked 21 students from diverse backgrounds and learning styles to take two learning style inventories prior to a usability study. The students then went through two short tutorials (a static web page tutorial with screenshots and a Camtasia screencast (video) tutorial, as well as a pre‐ and post‐test and debriefing for each. The “think aloud” protocol was used as their movements and voices were recorded using the Camtasia software.FindingsThe results of this study indicate that across all learning preferences students performed much better in recreating tasks when they used a static web page with screen shots than they did after viewing a screencasting tutorial.Practical implicationsSuggestions are offered for ways to create tutorials that are effective for multiple learning styles that will fit into a student's workflow.Originality/valueResults of this study may help inform other librarians in ways to effectively design tutorials and learning objects to meet student needs.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference35 articles.
1. Bailin, A. and Peña, A. (2007), “Online library tutorials, narratives, and scripts”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 106‐17.
2. Betty, P. (2008), “Creation, management, and assessment of library screencasts: The Regis Libraries Animated Tutorials Project”, Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 48 Nos 3‐4, pp. 295‐315.
3. Bevan, N. (2006), “International standards for HCI”, available at: http://nigelbevan.com/papers/International_standards_HCI.pdf (accessed 12 February 2012).
4. Bury, S. and Oud, J. (2005), “Usability testing of an online information literacy tutorial”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 54‐65.
5. Christison, M.A. (2003), “Learning styles and strategies”, in Nunan, D. (Ed.), Practical English Language Teaching, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY, pp. 267‐88.
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献