Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review the basic principles of qualitative analysis, and examine the practical application of these principles to analyze student assignments using the ATLAS.ti software.Design/methodology/approachStudent comments from an assignment are prepared for import into ATLAS.ti. The comments are coded, and then analyzed for patterns using ATLAS.ti and its mechanisms for exploring data and data patterns.FindingsATLAS.ti offers myriad analytic tools that allow the researcher to quantify qualitative information through coding, data query, cross‐tabulation, and networked visualization of project design. By developing both technical expertise with the software, and developing familiarity with qualitative methodology, librarians can wield an effective means to assess and evaluate text‐based data, such as student assignments or surveys.Research limitations/implicationsBecause the ATLAS.ti software, and the qualitative analysis process itself is so complex, this article can only outline the most prominent aspects of the tool.Practical implicationsThe document can serve as a “jumping‐off” point for other researchers wishing to either explore the qualitative analysis process, particularly as conducted with ATLAS.ti. The reader will become more familiar with the basic concepts of qualitative analysis as reflected in the organization and functions of the ATLAS.ti, as well as the process of preparing and analyzing textual information with ATLAS.ti.Originality/valueBecause there is a general lack of literature on setting up a project with the software, the article is potentially valuable to anyone wishing to expand and improve their evaluative skills using ATLAS.ti or similar tools.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference42 articles.
1. Bordonaro, K. (2006), “Language learning in the library: an exploratory study of ESL students”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 518‐26.
2. Borrelli, S., Johnson, C. and Cummings, L. (2009), “The ILE Project: a scalable option for customized information literacy instruction and assessment”, Communications in Information Literacy, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 128‐41, MURL: E‐Journal Full Text.
3. Brown, C.P. and Kingsley‐Wilson, B. (2010), “Assessing organically: turning an assignment into an assessment”, RSR Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 536‐56.
4. CannCasciato, D. (2011), “Incorporating accreditation into strategic planning in academic libraries: a look at nine libraries in Washington State”, PNLA Quarterly, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 5‐10.
5. Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献