Engaging undergraduates in discipline‐based research

Author:

Gauder Heidi,Jenkins Fred

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to describe the standards‐based approach used to build the International Studies Research Methods (INS250) course, a discipline‐specific, credit‐based class taught by librarians. This writing‐intensive course emphasizes information literacy and critical thinking skills, which were developed using written assignments, class presentations, multiple assessment methods, and web‐based applications.Design/methodology/approachThis paper will review the literature about discipline‐specific, credit‐based information literacy (IL) courses and outcomes. It will also analyze the INS250 course structure and map ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education to learning outcomes for the course.FindingsThe paper finds that, in the absence of discipline‐specific information literacy standards, the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education can serve as a starting point for International Studies course outcomes and assessment. Other assessment approaches, specifically student workshops and concept maps, promote student engagement and provide ample evidence of student learning.Originality/valueThis article will identify research skills needed by International Studies majors and students in similar multidisciplinary programs. It will serve as a model of how to build a credit‐based course with application to other fields such as political science, sustainability, human rights and international business. The course is student‐focused and responsive to new disciplines and areas, with an emphasis on disciplinary databases, search skills, and citation skills.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference29 articles.

1. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), “Information literacy standards for higher education”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm (accessed 30 October 2011).

2. Auer, N.J. and Krupar, E.M. (2005), “Librarians grading: giving As, Bs, Cs, Ds, and Fs”, Reference Librarian, Vol. 43 Nos 89/90, pp. 39‐61.

3. Blakeslee, S. (1998), “Librarian in a strange land: teaching a freshman orientation course”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 73‐8.

4. Blumberg, P. and Sparks, J. (1999), “Tracing the evolution of critical evaluation skills in students' use of the internet”, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 200‐5.

5. Brown, C.P. and Kingsley‐Wilson, B. (2010), “Assessing organically: turning an assignment into and assessment”, Reference Services Review, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 536‐56.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3