Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present and compare alternative theoretical frameworks for understanding entrepreneurship policy: targeted interventions to increase venture creation and/or performance. The authors contrast the Standard view of the state as a coherent entity willing and able to rectify market failures with an Individualistic view that treats policymakers as self-interested individuals with limited knowledge.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors draw on the perspective of “politics as exchange” to provide a taxonomy of assumptions about knowledge and incentives of both entrepreneurship policymakers and market participants. The authors position extant literature in relation to this taxonomy, and assess the implications of alternative assumptions.
Findings
The rationale for entrepreneurship policy intervention is strong under the Standard view but becomes considerably more tenuous in the Individualistic view. The authors raise several conceptual challenges to the Standard view, highlighting inconsistencies between this view and the fundamental elements of the entrepreneurial market process such as uncertainty, dispersed knowledge and self-interest.
Research limitations/implications
Entrepreneurship policy research is often applied; hence, the theoretical rationale for intervention can be overlooked. The authors make the implicit assumptions of these rationales explicit, showing how the adoption of “realistic” assumptions offers a robust toolkit to evaluate entrepreneurship policy.
Practical implications
While the authors agree with entrepreneurship policy interventionists that an “entrepreneurial society” is conducive to economic development, this framework suggests that targeted efforts to promote entrepreneurship may be inconsistent with that goal.
Originality/value
The Individualistic view draws on the rich traditions of public choice and the entrepreneurial market process to highlight the intended and unintended consequences of entrepreneurship policy.
Reference84 articles.
1. Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: a call to arms;Small Business Economics,2016
2. The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?;Small Business Economics,2014
3. Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: insights from behavioral economics;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2014
4. Audretsch, D.B., Grilo, I. and Thurik, A.R. (2007), “Explaining entrepreneurship and the role of policy: a framework”, in Audretsch, D.B., Grilo, I. and Thurik, A.R. (Eds), The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 1-17.
5. Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation;Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2007
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献