A LIS collaboratory to bridge the research‐practice gap

Author:

Ponti Marisa

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the notion of a collaboratory as a virtual learning community and discuss its significance to support collaboration between library and information science (LIS) researchers and practitioners.Design/methodology/approachThe LIS literature describes various forms of inter‐institutional collaboration involving librarians and information professionals, but there is an apparent lack of documented cases of collaboratories involving LIS practitioners and researchers. The paper draws from the literature about collaboratories in the fields of social informatics and information systems and describes the notion of collaboratory, its characteristics and main functions.FindingsIt is argued that a LIS collaboratory in the form of a virtual learning community has the potential to provide researchers and practitioners the opportunity to bring in and integrate their respective knowledge, expertise and connections, as well as expand participation of practitioners in research projects. Another claim is that this virtual learning community may fill a critical niche for small institutions as LIS schools and practitioners, and give them the opportunity to choose and work together on relevant research projects. While the prospect of LIS collaboratory looks promising, the challenges to building one need not be overlooked, in particular working at distance and crossing institutional boundaries. More research is needed on the socio‐organizational issues that can influence collaboration between LIS researchers and practitioners.Research limitations/implicationsThe discussion is based on the author's review of the literature and observations.Originality/valueThe notion of collaboratory is still new to the LIS field. This paper offers the opportunity to trigger a new discussion on collaboration between researchers and practitioners and the potential of collaboratories to support new forms of collaboration.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference38 articles.

1. Allen‐Meares, P., Hudgins, C.A., Engberg, M.E. and Lessnau, B. (2005), “Using a collaboratory model to translate social work research into practice and policy”, Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 29‐40.

2. American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ACLS) (2006), “Our cultural commonwealth: the report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social Sciences”, available at: www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/acls.ci.report.pdf (accessed March 5, 2007).

3. Arzberger, P. and Finholt, T.A. (2002), Data and Collaboratories in the Biomedical Community: Report of a Panel of Experts Meeting, Alliance Center for Collaboration Education Science and Software (ACCESS), Ballston, VA.

4. Atkinson, M. (2006), “Open your hearts”, The Times Higher Education Supplement on E‐science.

5. Axelsson, A.‐S., Sonnenwald, D.H. and Spante, M. (2006), “Needs and challenges with respect to establishing a collaboratory within library and information science: practitioners' perspectives”, in Steinerova, J. (Ed.), Information Use in the Information Society, Centrum vedecko‐technickych informacii, Bratislava, pp. 5‐12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3