Abstract
PurposeIntegrating individual and relational centric voice literature, the authors draw on self-presentation theory to analyse the role of status pursuit in employee voice. Status pursuit is believed to be ubiquitous as it is linked to access to scarce resources and social order pecking.Design/methodology/approachThe authors present a cross-level conceptual model outlining relational nuances of employee status pursuit that drive upward voice.FindingsThe model integrates status pursuit with peer- and leader-related facets, focusing on three targets of voice: immediate leader (supervisor), diagonal leader (supervisor of another team/unit) and co-workers. The model highlights how employee voice can be directed to diverse targets, and depending on interpersonal attributes, how it serves as underlying links for upward voice.Originality/valueWhile employee voice can help to address important workplace concerns, it can also be used to advance employees' self-interest. Though there is a wealth of research on the importance of employee voice to organisational performance and individual wellbeing, especially through collective representation such as trade unions, there is a lack of literature on how employees navigate the social-relational work setting to promote their interests and develop status.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology
Reference93 articles.
1. Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do;European Review of Social Psychology,2009
2. Anderson, C. and Cowan, J. (2014), “Personality and status attainment: a micropolitics perspective”, in Cheng, J., Tracy, J. and Anderson, C. (Eds), The Psychology of Social Status, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 99-117.
3. The pursuit of status in social groups;Current Directions in Psychological Science,2009
4. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001
5. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature;Psychological Bulletin,2015