Identifying and responding to social media risks: towards an organizational paracrisis communication framework

Author:

Chen FeifeiORCID,Holladay Sherry J.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to advance paracrisis research by clarifying paracrises’ distinct features and developing typologies of paracrises and response strategies with strong external validity.Design/methodology/approachA case series study of 143 paracrises systematically selected from various news and trade sources was conducted to build an organizational paracrisis communication framework that connects paracrisis clusters with paracrisis response strategies.FindingsResults of the study attest to the validity of the paracrisis concept by demonstrating refined paracrisis clusters’ connections with refined paracrisis response strategies.Research limitations/implicationsThis study enriches paracrisis research by refining the paracrisis definition, paracrisis clusters and response strategies. Its rigorous descriptions of how organizations address paracrises distinguish paracrisis response strategies from traditional crisis response strategies and generate rich possibilities for future analytic investigations.Originality/valueAs perhaps the first empirical attempt to build a comprehensive framework of organizational paracrisis communication, this descriptive study lays the groundwork for the burgeoning paracrisis communication research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Industrial relations

Reference36 articles.

1. Dialogic communication in faux pas paracrises. What do users want to discuss on brands’ official Facebook pages?;Journal of Promotional Communications,2019

2. Communicative dynamics and the polyphony of corporate social responsibility in the network society;Journal of Business Ethics,2013

3. Unpacking the evolution of a paracrisis: the case of #DeleteUber;Corporate Reputation Review,2021

4. Deep and surface threats: conceptual and practical implications for ‘crisis’ vs. ‘problem’;Public Relations Review,2002

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3