Author:
Ahmetoglu Gorkan,Dobbs Stacey,Furnham Adrian,Crump John,Chamorro-Premuzic Tomas,Bakhshalian Elmira
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship of the Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder (FFM PD) count technique to industrial, work, and organizational (IWO) criteria. In this vein, the present research sought to extend previous studies (e.g. De Fruyt et al., 2009) by eliminating common method variance, and by including several objectively assessed IWO criteria, namely, managerial level, intelligence, and creativity.
Design/methodology/approach
– In total, 1,659 working adults reported their managerial level in their organization, and completed two intelligence tests, a measure of creativity, and a measure of the Big Five personality traits in an assessment centre. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.
Findings
– Results showed that the FFM PD counts were significantly associated with each IWO criteria. Results also show that specific linear combinations of Five-Factor Model facets can explain a larger proportion of the variance in these criteria. Finally, normative benchmark values are provided and validated for personnel development contexts in the UK.
Research limitations/implications
– Because the FFM PD score-distributions were limited to one assessment setting (medium stakes) only, the use of proposed benchmarks may not be appropriate for other contexts.
Practical implications
– Considering the mounting evidence in the area, assessing dark side traits is likely to be desirable for organizations – particularly in selection and development settings.
Originality/value
– This study is the first to demonstrate the validity of the FFM PD count technique in relation to objectively measured IWO criteria.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference57 articles.
1. Ackerman, P.
and
Heggestad, E.
(1997), “Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits”,
Psychological Bulletin
, Vol. 121 No. 2, pp. 219-245.
2. Ahmetoglu, G.
,
Chamorro-Premuzic, T.
and
Furnham, A.
(2010), “Interpersonal Relationship Orientations, Leadership, and Managerial Level: assessing the practical usefulness of the FIRO-B in organisations”,
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 220-225.
3. American Psychiatric Association
(1994),
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
, 4th ed., American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
4. Arbuckle, J.
(2003),
Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User’s Guide
, Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago, IL.
5. Barrick, M.R.
and
Mount, M.K.
(1991), “The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis”,
Personal Psychology
, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1-26.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献