Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to introduce, illustrate and explore the use of process recording as a pedagogical tool in behavioural ethics education.
Design/methodology/approach
An overview of the nature and components of process recording as a pedagogical tool is provided. Potential challenges and benefits associated with its use are described. The particular relevance of process recording for behavioural ethics education is highlighted. Illustrative examples of ethics-related process records are discussed.
Findings
Process recording shows promise as a pedagogical technique for meeting three goals of behavioural ethics education (i.e. Chugh and Kern, 2016). These include: enhancing literacy with research-supported concepts and principles such that these can be applied in “real-world” settings; increasing student awareness of gaps that might exist between their intended and actual ethical behaviour; and, fostering the sense that ethical skills are not static, but rather, open to development.
Research limitations/implications
This paper introduces, illustrates and explores the use of process recording in behavioural ethics education. Additional, more systematic study of process recording in ethics education would be useful.
Practical implications
Process recording shows promise as a tool for supporting learning about behavioural ethics. Practical information on its use and concrete examples are provided.
Originality/value
Despite the need for pedagogical tools in behavioural ethics education, as well as the previously identified relevance of process recording as a potential tool in ethics education, there has been no prior exploration or illustration of process recording within this realm.
Reference41 articles.
1. Process recording revisited: a learning-oriented thematic approach integrating field education and classroom curriculum;Journal of Teaching in Social Work,2006
2. Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: why milliseconds matter;Social Justice Research,2004
3. Chugh, D. and Kern, M.C. (2016), “Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn”, in Palmer, E., Smith-Crowe, K. and Greenwood, R. (Eds), Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 474-503.
4. Chugh, D., Bazerman, M.H. and Banaji, M. (2005), “Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest”, in Moore, D., Cain, D., Loewenstein, G. and Bazerman, M. (Eds), Conflict of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 74-95.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献