Cue incongruity in wine personality formation and purchasing
Author:
Heslop Louise A.,Cray David,Armenakyan Anahit
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the direct and interaction effects of brand name (BN) of wine and country‐of‐origin (COO) on perceptions of the personality image of the wine, expected price, and willingness to engage with the wine.Design/methodology/approachA field experiment in which label information for a fictitious wine was presented to wine consumers with a questionnaire on wine perceptions and response measures. The label information was manipulated across subjects using four BNs and three COOs.FindingsThe study confirms BN and COO effects on perceived wine personality and responses to the wine. Findings also indicate the effects of BN and COO as well as a BN‐COO interaction effect on price expectations.Research limitations/implicationsFindings link different personality dimensions to the two different cues, suggesting greater independence of the cues than originally expected. However, some BN‐COO incongruity effects are found particularly regarding price perceptions. A small set of wine BNs and COOs are tested and sample size/treatments are limited. With larger sample sizes, some weak effects might prove more significant. For more substantive support of these findings, the study could be repeated in different locations with different BN and COO examples.Practical implicationsThe results suggest consumers are open to some fluidity in brand name use across wine‐producing countries with appropriate pricing strategies. They also highlight the importance of understanding consumer perceptions of wine personality in assessing consumer responses and price expectations.Originality/valueThe research addresses BN and COO direct and interaction effects on many aspects of wine evaluation and the central role of personality dimensions in wine assessments. The paper provides evidence of value in a rapidly evolving marketplace for wine and insights into the ongoing strategic changes in the wine market. It also contributes to theory and research on information cue use and cue incongruity effects.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, Free Press, New York, NY. 2. Aaker, J.L. (1997), “Dimensions of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 347‐56. 3. Aaker, J.L., Benet‐Martinez, V. and Garolera, J. (2001), “Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: a study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 492‐508. 4. Barber, N., Almanza, B.A. and Donovan, J.R. (2006), “Motivational factors of gender, income and age on selecting a bottle of wine”, International Journal of Wine Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 218‐32. 5. Batra, R., Lehmann, D.R. and Singh, D. (1993), “The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences”, in Aaker, D.A. and Biel, A. (Eds), Brand Equity and Advertising, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 83‐96.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|