Author:
A.O. Dos Santos Maria,Svensson Göran,Padin Carmen
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to describe a “fivefold bottom line” approach in implementing and reporting corporate efforts of sustainable business practices.
Design/methodology/approach
– This viewpoint from industry is based on the content analysis of the South African retail chain Woolworths. The data are gathered and derived from the company's comprehensive annual and sustainability reports from 2008 to 2011 and the company's press releases for this period focusing on their efforts of implementing and reporting sustainable business practices.
Findings
– A lesson learned from the presented “fivefold bottom line” approach to implement and report their corporate efforts of sustainable business practices is that it is adapted to fit and make sense in a specific market and society. The triple bottom line approach is usually derived from, or commonly based upon, a western perspective on the market and society in literature.
Research limitations/implications
– The authors argues that insights from industry of implementing and reporting sustainable business practices based upon different corporate “bottom line” approaches are required in literature.
Practical implications
– The authors propose that the “triple bottom line” approach may need to be commonly adapted to the country and cultural context in focus, which is not normally done, but templates are used.
Originality/value
– Triple bottom line reporting tends to follow common approaches how it is done. There is rarely seen adapted or modified “bottom line” approaches to specific market and societal characteristics in literature.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference29 articles.
1. Brundtland, G.H.
(1987), Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Carson, R.
(1962), Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
3. Crane, A.
(2000), “Marketing and the natural environment: what role for morality?”, Journal of Macro Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 144-154.
4. De Boer, J.
(2003), “Sustainability labeling scheme: the logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 12, pp. 254-264.
5. Dyllick, T.
and
Hockerts, K.
(2002), “Beyond the business case for corporate social responsibility”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 11, pp. 130-141.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献