Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to reflect on Nenonen et al.’s paper on theorizing with managers. This paper discusses differences between marketing science and marketing practice and gives suggestions to reduce the theory–praxis gap. It gives examples of quantitative studies that have been performed with practioners and use the choices proposed by Nenonen et al. to draw conclusions.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper is based on personal experience of the author, which is supported by a substantial number of empirical studies.
Findings
Cooperation with marketing managers/decision-makers is most successful when the initiator is the practitioner. Public policy and litigation are the most promising areas for cooperation. It is difficult to publish the outcomes of these “joint” studies in top journals.
Originality/value
This study extends and continues the results of the study by Nenonen et al.
Reference24 articles.
1. Predicting advertising expenditures using intention surveys;International Journal of Forecasting,1994
2. Diagnosing competition in an industrial market,1990
3. Have we progressed marketing knowledge? A meta-meta-analysis of effect sizes in marketing research;Journal of Marketing,2015
4. Varying parameter models to accommodate dynamic promotion effects;Journal of Econometrics,1999
5. Market response models and marketing practice;Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry,2005
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献