Author:
Eapen Tojin Thomas,Finkenstadt Daniel J.
Abstract
Purpose
This article proposes that survival can be a legitimate organizational goal, challenging a common view that dismisses it as unambitious or contrary to innovation. Drawing parallels from nature and survival strategies across various systems, it advocates that organizations, much like living organisms, should prioritize survivability (i.e. ability to survive) to ensure long-term success. Contrary to being seen as limiting, survival, when understood in its broad sense, can encompass and enhance performance goals such as growth. The article outlines the ERP factors —efficiency, resilience and prominence—as key to achieving survivability, offering a framework for organizations to manage resources, adapt to external forces and balance visibility to thrive amidst challenges.
Design/methodology/approach
Conceptual framework.
Findings
This model introduces the significance of survivability as an organizational goal.
Originality/value
This article argues for the consideration of survival as an overarching organizational goal, challenging the prevalent view that dismisses it as unambitious or contrary to innovation.
Reference29 articles.
1. A history of the survivability design of military aircraft,1995
2. Establishing the fundamentals of a surface ship survivability design discipline;Naval Engineers Journal,1994
3. Concepts, goals, and the control of survival-related behaviors;Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences,2018
4. Why are we here?;Harvard Business Review,2019