Author:
Patti Charles H.,van Dessel Maria M.,Hartley Steven W.
Abstract
Purpose
How can customer service be so bad in an era when companies collect endless data on customer interactions? The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the important challenge of elevating customer service delivery by providing guidelines for when and how to select optimal measures of customer service measurement using a new decision framework.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper uses a comprehensive, multi-dimensional review of extant literature related to customer service, journey mapping and performance measurement and applied a qualitative, taxonomic approach for model development.
Findings
A process model and customer journey mapping framework can facilitate the selection and application of appropriate and relevant customer service experience metrics to enhance customer service experience strategies, creation and delivery.
Research limitations/implications
The taxonomy of customer service metrics is limited to current publicly and commercially available metrics. The dynamic nature of the customer service environment necessitates continuous updates of the model and framework.
Practical implications
Selection of customer service performance measures should match relevant stages of the customer journey; use perception-based, operational and outcome-based metrics that track employee and customer behaviours; improve omni-channel measurement; and integrate data-sharing and benchmark measurement initiatives through collaboration with customer service communities.
Originality/value
A reimagined perspective is offered to the complex challenge of measuring and improving customer service, providing a new decision-making framework for customer service experience measurement and guidance for future research.
Reference109 articles.
1. When good brands do bad;Journal of Consumer Research,2004
2. Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF;Marketing Intelligence and Planning,2006
3. Acuant (2019), “Self-service tech market to exceed $31b by 2020”, available at: www.acuantcorp.com/news/self-service-tech-market/
4. Viewpoint: service research priorities – bridging the academic and practitioner perspectives;Journal of Services Marketing,2019
5. Pleasure principles: a review of research on hedonic consumption;Journal of Consumer Psychology,2013
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献