Abstract
PurposeThe construction industry continues to struggle to deliver a right first time culture, seeking a panacea for improvement whilst maintaining project milestones. Complex construction projects demand stringent programmes, however, (un)foreseen changes, political influences and human behaviours all have significant impacts on delivering schemes without error. Previous studies have questioned the ability of the construction industry to successfully learn from errors. A major barrier has been the sharing of sensitive data from failed outcomes. Hence, this paper investigates non-conformance on an existing scheme and suggests avenues for improvement.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-method approach was adopted whereby 1,260 non-conformance reports (NCRs) from a highways megaproject were interrogated using root cause analysis (RCA) techniques to uncover the most frequent and costly areas. This was followed by a survey to industry professionals within a tier 1 principal contractor to gain insight into their perceptions of non-conformance and rework on construction projects.FindingsUsing Pareto analysis, the authors find that materials management, workmanship (poor quality execution) and supervision issues are the most frequently occurring and costly root causes of non-conformance on a major highways scheme. Furthermore, the authors link corresponding viewpoints of two project professional groups to the posed, achieving a high degree of consensus for the areas requiring development. Lastly, the authors suggest avenues for improvement via lessons learnt. These include greater emphasis on quality culture via a strong leadership mandate, enhanced vetting of workforce competence and improving the way materials are managed by embracing technology to drive efficiency.Originality/valueThis paper interrogates a current highways scheme using a uniquely rich, sensitive dataset to determine how the construction sector may improve efforts to achieving right first time outcomes.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. The cost of non-conformance during a highway project: a case study;Construction Management and Economics,1995
2. Capturing the cost of non‐conformance on construction sites: an application of the quality cost matrix;International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,1996
3. Reasoning mechanism for construction non-conformance root-cause analysis;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008
4. Buchanan, D., Boddy, D. and McCalman, J. (2013), “Getting in, getting on, getting out, and getting back”, in Doing Research in Organizations (RLE: Organizations), Routledge, pp. 63-77.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献