Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine the impact of wealth tax (zakat) and corporate tax (CT) on the firm's capital structure. The pioneering works of capital structure were introduced by Modgliani and Miller (1958). Subsequently, these studies were extended by other authors such as Elton and Gruber (1970), Miller (1977), DeAngelo and Masulis (1980), Mackie-Mason (1990), Harris and Raviv (1991), Rajan and Zingales (1995) and Booth et al. (2001). The diversity of the study covers from the advantage of CT to the cost of debt financing. The empirical evidence has also been applied to different countries with a good data access and different legal and accounting environments. However, this study is still relevant especially on the advantages of wealth tax, and the utilization of Islamic debt and equity financing to the firm's capital structure.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study uses the sample of Malaysian firms that are listed in the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. The cross-sectional and time-series data covering 422 companies from 1996 to 2000 are compiled from the database published by the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. All the sample firms are listed as a syariah company that normally pays the wealth tax. These data, then, are used to examine the effects of several explanatory variables, i.e. wealth tax and CT, and several controlled variables on firm capital structure decisions.
Findings
– The results showed that, first, the significance of wealth tax is consistent with the argument that firms that pay high wealth tax should be financed with relatively more debt. Second, as the CT rate is raised, firms are subjected to lower CT rates which would lead them to utilize more debt in their capital structures. Third, a significant relationship exists between age, size, return on assets, volatility, industry classification, tangible assets and bankruptcy with the capital structure.
Originality/value
– This paper viewed the tax benefits and the zakat payments in isolation. However, the tax deductions and the zakat payments are both expected to influence the capital structure decisions. The paper will study this decision and reveal the determinants that influence the capital structure decisions in general and the specific choice of payments, i.e. tax and zakat payments.
Subject
Finance,Business and International Management
Reference45 articles.
1. Aggrawal, R.
(1981), “International differences in capital structure norms: an empirical study of large European companies”, Management International Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 75-88.
2. Anderson, C.W.
and
Makhija, A.K.
(1999), “Deregulation, disintermediation and agency costs of debt: evidence from Japan”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 309-339.
3. Asquith, P.
,
Gertner, R.
and
Scharfstein, D.S.
(1994), “Anatomy of financial distress: an examination of junk-bond issuers”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, pp. 625-658.
4. Berger, A.
and
Udell, G.
(1990), “Collateral, loan quality and bank risk”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 21-42.
5. Bevan, A.
and
Danbolt, J.
(2000a), “Panel estimation of the determinants of capital structure in the UK”, available at: www.fma.org/Paris/danbolt.pdf (accessed 21 November 2003).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献