Author:
Henderson Fenella,Anderson Neil,Rick Steve
Abstract
Describes a three‐phase study to validate and redesign the graduate
assessment centres used by ICL. Analyses results by multimethod
multitrait correlation matrix and intercorrelating ratings of dimensions
both across and within exercises. Factor analyses correlation matrices
by the principal components method. Evaluates differences between the
hired and rejected groups by discriminant function analysis. Assesses
the predictive validity by multiple regression analysis on the
performance ratings and salary information. Discusses the redesign of
the recruitment procedure to select for future competences as well as
present day requirements.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology
Reference21 articles.
1. 1. Robertson, I.T. and Makin, P.J., “Management selection in Britain: a survey and
critique”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, No.
59, 1986, pp. 45‐57.
2. 2. Shackleton, V. and Newell, S., “Management selection: a comparative survey of
methods used in top British and French companies”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, No. 64, pp. 23‐36.
3. 3. Anderson, N.R. and Herriot, P., Assessment and Selection in Organizations: Methods and
Practice for Recriutment and Appraisal, First Update,
Wiley, Chichester, 1995.
4. 4. Thornton, G.C. III and Byham, W.C., Assessment Centers and Managerial Performance, Academic Press, New York, NY.
5. 5. Anderson, N.R., Payne, T. and Ferguson, E., “Modelling assessor
decision‐making: an investigation into decision heuristics and
information overload in a British assessment centre”, Personnel Review, Vol. 23 No. 1, 1993, pp. 52‐63.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献