Collaborative production of pedagogical knowledge: enhancing students’ learning

Author:

Rovio‐Johansson Airi,Lumsden Marie

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate students’ qualitatively different ways of understanding basic economic relationships in three undergraduate courses in the discipline of accounting.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical frame is variation theory, which is a learning theory about the different ways students understand the learning object (in this study, basic economic relationships). The instructors chose a learning object which was investigated under two different teaching conditions – the traditional lecture model and the adjusted Learning Study model. Two student groups in a Business Programme (one group admitted the year after the first group) were identified as a comparison group and a target group. The two groups were comparable in various relevant parameters. All students took three required accounting courses. In the comparison group, the instructors used the traditional lecture model; in the target group, the instructors used the adjusted Learning Study model. The first year of the study was used for training the instructors and for the preparation of teaching prerequisites.FindingsThere were significant differences between the two groups’ examination results in the three courses. Students in the adjusted Learning Study model group performed better. The conclusions have scientific implications for students’ understanding of the subject and educational implications for teaching in terms of new teaching methods and revised curricula. The findings are valuable to professional instructors/lecturers in higher education.Originality/valueThe findings and methods of this study contribute to the international research on empirically based didactic knowledge of subject content in higher education. Even though the subject content is specific in the study, the methodology of variation theory is applicable to other disciplines.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference21 articles.

1. Bowden, J. and Marton, F. (1998), The University of Learning, Kogan Page, London.

2. Dahlgren, L.O. (1989), “Fragments of an economic habitus. Conceptions of economic phenomena in freshmen and seniors”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. IV No. 4, pp. 547‐58.

3. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

4. European University Association (EUA) (2007), Europe's New Higher Education Landscape, EUA, Brussels.

5. Holmqvist, M. (2006), Lärande i skolan. Learning study som skolutvecklingsmodell [Learning in School. Learning Study as a Model of School Development], Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3