An Empirical Comparison of Anticipatory and Response‐Based Supply Chain Strategies

Author:

Closs David J.,Roath Anthony S.,Goldsby Thomas J.,Eckert James A.,Swartz Stephen M.

Abstract

This paper reports simulation research that empirically investigates and compares supply chain performance under varying conditions of information exchange and demand uncertainty. Specifically, the research objective is to quantitatively document the characteristics and performance impact of information exchange among supply chain entities. The findings suggest that the response‐based supply chain model consistently outperforms the anticipatory model in terms of customer service delivered under conditions of both low and high demand variation. Comparisons of inventory holdings across supply chain models demonstrate that the retailers' inventory burden is significantly lower in the response‐based scenario. The inventory savings enjoyed by retailers in the response‐based model are substantial enough to lower system‐wide inventories. In sum, the study supports the feasibility of achieving both improved service and lower inventories as a result of information sharing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Transportation,Business and International Management

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Disruptive Logistics and Green Supply Chain Management;Handbook of Research on Sustainable Supply Chain Management for the Global Economy;2020

2. Bibliography;The Impact of Print-On-Demand on Academic Books;2018

3. Integrated supply chain risk management: a systematic review;The International Journal of Logistics Management;2017-11-13

4. Assessing the impact of business uncertainty on supply chain integration;The International Journal of Logistics Management;2016-08-08

5. Logistics service quality and its effects on customer satisfaction in the manufacturing companies’ supply chains;Journal of Modelling in Management;2014-07-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3