Author:
Politis Yannis,Giovanis Apostolos,Binioris Spyridon
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to implement a multi-criteria preference disaggregation approach to measure logistics service quality (LSQ) of manufacturing companies’ supply chains.
Design/methodology/approach
– A total 216 Greek manufacturing companies took part in a survey with the use of a dedicated questionnaire. They were asked to assess the LSQ of their primary supplier regarding a predefined set of criteria and sub-criteria. The data were analysed with the multi-criteria satisfaction analysis method, which represents an ordinal regression based approach used for customer satisfaction measurement.
Findings
– Weak points of the suppliers as well as dimensions that drive satisfaction were identified. Furthermore, the competitive advantages of the suppliers as well as their priorities for improvement were spotted.
Research limitations/implications
– The sampling framework, including only the manufacturing companies operating in a specific area of Greece, does not ensure the full generalisation of the results. A larger sample of manufacturing companies from all over Greece would be useful to obtain more reliable results and would enable the comparison of LSQ for different manufacturing sectors.
Practical implications
– The method used to assess LSQ of manufacturing companies can be installed as a permanent customer satisfaction barometer to measure, control and improve the LSQ provided to manufacturing companies as well as to other business sectors.
Originality/value
– This paper proposes a method to explore the relationships between LSQ and industrial customers’ satisfaction to prioritise strategic plans of companies in the supply chains.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference84 articles.
1. Abdullah, F.
(2006), “Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 31-47.
2. Bana e Costa, C.
and
Vansnick, J.
(2008), “A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 187 No. 3, pp. 1422-1428.
3. Bhatti, R.S.
,
Kumar, P.
and
Kumar, D.
(2009), “Integrated DEAHP model for selection of 3PL service providers by global fourth party logistics integrators”, International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Management (IJBPSCM), Vol. 1 Nos 2/3, pp. 187-202.
4. Bhatti, R.S.
,
Kumar, P.
and
Kumar, D.
(2010), “Analytical modelling of third party service provider selection in lead logistics provider environments”, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 275-286.
5. Bienstock, C.C.
and
Royne, M.B.
(2010), “Technology acceptance and satisfaction with logistics services”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 271-292.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献